Claybough:”Ron Paul Introduces Bill to Repeal NDAA’s Indefinite Detention”

January 20th, 2012

“Texas Congressman and GOP presidential contender Ron Paul is continuing his battle for liberty even as he is focused on his fight for the White House. This week, he introduced legislation to overturn the dangerous provisions found within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).”

“Rep. Paul spoke on the House floor, specifically against Section 1021 of the NDAA, which includes language which permits the government to detain anyone who “substantially supported al Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States.” Paul fears — as do a number of other opponents to the law — that the language can be used against U.S. citizens as well.”

“Sections 1021 and 1022 in the new bill were originally sections 1031 and 1032 in the old version of the bill.”

“As noted by LewRockwell.com, however, the main difference between the new and old versions of the NDAA is the insertion of one paragraph between the “Implementation Procedures” and “Effective Date,” which is found in the new version. That paragraph reads:

(d) AUTHORITIES. — Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect the existing criminal enforcement and national security authorities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other domestic law enforcement agency with regard to a covered person, regardless whether such covered person is held in military custody.

“Still, most contend that the new language is scarcely enough to ensure that the rights of U.S. citizens guaranteed by the Constitution are secure.”

Raven Clabough gives a full report in The New American @ http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/10608-ron-paul-introduces-bill-to-repeal-ndaas-indefinite-detention

RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBERTARIANS TO MEET

January 20th, 2012

RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBERTARIANS TO MEET
–Wednesday February 22, 2012 7:00PM to 9:00PM
–El Serape Restaurant,
4023 Market Street in Riverside

Join us as we make plans to promote freedom in 2012:
–Gary Johnson for President
–End Marijuana Prohibition
–End Redevelopment Permanently

Anyone interested in Freedom is welcome to attend
No charge to attend, but we do pass the hat to support our activities

More information call Gene Berkman @ Renaissance Book Shop (951) 369-8843
or visit our new location @ 3772 Elizabeth Street in Riverside (just off
Magnolia Ave)

GOVERNOR GARY JOHNSON ANNOUNCES HE WILL SEEK LIBERTARIAN NOMINATION

December 28th, 2011

December 28, 2011, Santa Fe, NM – At a morning news conference in the Rotunda of the New Mexico State Capitol, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson today announced that he is seeking the Libertarian Party nomination for president.

Governor Johnson’s announcement statement:

“Today I am announcing that I will seek the Libertarian nomination for President of the United States. The Libertarian Party nominee will be on the ballot in all 50 states – as they were in 2008, and will offer a principled alternative to the Republican and the Democrat.

“This was both a difficult decision – and an easy one. It was difficult because I have a lot of Republican history, and a lot of Republican supporters. But in the final analysis, as many, many commentators have said after examining how I governed in New Mexico, I am a Libertarian — that is, someone who is fiscally very conservative but holds freedom-based positions on the issues that govern our personal behavior.

“Frankly, I have been deeply disappointed by the treatment I received in the Republican nomination process. I had hoped to lay out a real libertarian message on all the issues in the Republican contest. The process was not fair and open.

“This election is about issues larger than party or personal ambition.The future of our country is at stake. “

I believe this election needs a true libertarian voice. While Ron Paul is a good man and a libertarian who I proudly endorsed for president in 2008, there is no guarantee that he will be the Republican nominee.

“My Agenda for America, a libertarian agenda, is clear. It is not at an agenda you will hear from any other candidate or party.

- I want to end deficit spending and cut federal spending by 43%. – I want to enact the Fair Tax to stimulate real economic growth and job creation.

– I want to end the manipulation of our money by the Federal Reserve. – I support the Second Amendment and oppose gun control.

- I oppose expensive foreign wars in places like Libya and Afghanistan where our national interest is not clear. -I want to cut the over-regulation of our families, our businesses and our lives.

- I support a woman’s right to choose.

- I support marriage equality for gay Americans, as required by the Constitution.

- I support the legalization of marijuana, which will save us billions and do no harm.

– I demand a government free of special interest influence, crony capitalism and corruption.

- I support returning strict adherence to Constitutional principles to our government.

“I am confident this agenda will resonate with the American people because it actually reflects the true beliefs of a clear majority of Americans.

Complete statement @ http://www.garyjohnson2012.com/governor-gary-johnson-announces-he-will-seek-libertarian-nomination

Gov. Gary Johnson to hold news conference December 28

December 24th, 2011

Governor Johnson will be holding a News Conference on Wednesday, December 28th, 2011 at 10AM MST. It will be held at the Santa Fe, NM State Capitol building, in the Rotunda. We look forward to seeing you in attendance. If you do come, please contact the Marriott Courtyard Santa Fe at (505) 473-2800 and tell them you’re with Gary Johnson and get a discounted room rate beginning on the 27th.

Readers of this site who are unable to make it can see the event streamed live on www.GaryJohnson2012.com or www.Yowie.com.

Governor Johnson will announce his plans for 2012, which may include a challenge to the two-party system.

Steve Chapman exposes Newt’s commitment to Big Government

December 5th, 2011

Conservatives looking for an alternative to Mitt Romney have put Newt Gingrich into a temporary lead for the Republican nomination. Steve Champman reminds us that Newt has backed many big government “innovations” – cap & trade, mandated health insurance, and much much more. Read Mr Chapman’s expose @ http://reason.com/archives/2011/12/05/supporting-newt-gingrich-over-mitt-romne
In other news, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson will speak at an even sponsored by the Florida Libertarian Party. Governor Johnson has been frozen out of the Republican debates, and may seek the Libertarian Party nomination for President in 2012. The Florida Independent reports @ http://floridaindependent.com/59301/gary-johnson-libertarian-party-of-florida

Suderman: Democrats got Insurance Mandate idea from Republicans

October 21st, 2011

It is an important but often overlooked fact that the individual mandate to purchase health insurance, the least popular and most constitutionally dubious provision in the health care overhaul signed last year by President Obama, originated at The Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative think tank with strong ties to congressional Republicans. In between its inception at Heritage and its passage as one of the key elements of ObamaCare, it got a trial run in Massachusetts in the state-based health care overhaul passed by current GOP presidential wannabe Mitt Romney, who on Tuesday admitted having gotten the idea for the mandate in part from Heritage.

Peter Suderman, writing @ reason.com, quotes a James Taranto article in the Wall Street Journal:
“Heritage did put forward the idea of an individual mandate, though it predated HillaryCare by several years.”

Taranto notes that at the time Heritage developed the idea ” “Universal health care” was neither already established nor inevitable,” and that he thought “the foundation had made a serious philosophical and strategic error in accepting rather than disputing the left-liberal notion that the provision of “quality, affordable health care” to everyone was a proper role of government.”

Full column by Peter Suderman @ http://reason.com/blog/2011/10/20/democrats-learned-about-obamac

Tennant:”The Military-industrial Complex’s War on Defense Cuts”

September 12th, 2011

The military-industrial complex is pulling out all the stops to ensure that not one dime of its vast federal largess is taken away even as the nation faces nearly $15 trillion in debt. Defense contractors, Representatives and Senators, and current and former Defense Secretaries are working together to thwart actual and potential cuts in defense spending resulting from the August debt ceiling deal.

The deal calls for $350 billion in defense cuts over 10 years — an average of $35 billion per year. In addition, it tasks the newly created congressional super-committee with finding an additional $1.2 trillion in savings over that same time period. Should the committee fail to come to an agreement on those savings, automatic cuts totaling the same amount, split evenly between defense and domestic spending, are slated to occur. If that took place, defense spending would then be reduced by $600 billion, an average of $60 billion per year.

That may sound like a huge dent in the Pentagon’s budget, but there are two things to keep in mind. First, those cuts are almost certainly reductions in the projected rate of budgetary growth, not actual reductions in spending. Second, total defense spending is around $1 trillion, according to economist Robert Higgs, of which $676 billion was budgeted to the Defense Department — up from $432 billion in 2001. Moreover, according to the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments:

“Overall, nearly half of the growth in defense spending over the past decade is unrelated to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — personnel costs grew while end strength remained relatively flat, the cost of peacetime operations grew while the pace of peacetime operations declined, and acquisition costs increased while the inventory of equipment grew smaller and older. The base budget now supports a force with essentially the same size, force structure, and capabilities as in FY 2001 but at a 35 percent higher cost. The Department is spending more but not getting more.”

Full column by Michael Tennant @ http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/8946-the-military-industrial-complexs-war-on-defense-cuts

A Barton Hinkle on “Obama’s Crony Capitalism”

September 9th, 2011

A Barton Hinkle looks at the troubling case of solar panel manufacturer Solyndra, which has received federal assistance as a “green energy” company, but has recently filed for bankruptcy. Solyndra is now subject to a federal investigation.

The president’s address on jobs last night included some soaring phrases, but it left out one crucial word that epitomizes his approach to economics: Solyndra.

Fourteen months ago, the president was using his sonorous baritone to deliver soaring rhetoric about how his policies helped launch that now-broke company, which made cylindrical solar panels. The administration fast-tracked Solyndra’s loan guarantee through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act—i.e. the stimulus—perhaps because Solyndra’s principal backers just happened to have donated huge sums to the Obama election campaign. Washington guaranteed more than a half-billion in loans to Solyndra on the promise of 4,000 jobs.

This new factory is the result of those loans,” the president said at the Fremont, Calif., facility—a facility The Washington Post termed a “signature project of President Obama’s initiative to help create clean-energy jobs.” The result of those loans now? Solyndra has shut its doors, its 1,100 former employees are jobless, and the taxpayers are on the hook for perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars.

Viewed in isolation, the Solyndra story is mildly troubling. But it is nothing Washington has not seen before. The late, great columnist Molly Ivins wrote some crackerjack pieces about the return on investment that corporate sharpies used to get from their campaign donations to Republican politicians. The Solyndra story sounds like the same old, same old.

Except it isn’t. The Solyndra story encapsulates a much bigger issue than mere crony capitalism, bad as that is. Because Solyndra is not alone. The Obama administration has sunk billions into loan guarantees for dozens of other renewable-energy companies as well.Complete column @ http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/09/obamas-crony-capitalism

Texas RLC:”Don’t Believe the Hype. Meet the Real Rick Perry”

August 15th, 2011

The Republican Liberty Caucus takes a look at the record of Governor Rick Perry, and warns conservatives that “Perry has a unique talent for finding new ways to raise taxes and loves to use taxpayer money to subsidize his business cronies,” in the words of Dave Nalle, Secretary of Texas RLC. Mr Nalle adds “His supposed belief in limited government and states rights conveniently disappears whenever it conflicts with the demands of the special interests and corporate cronies who he serves.”

The file on Perry’s abuses of power, insider deals with cronies and tax and spend policies is thick, but for a start here are what Texas RLC members voted as the top five Perry scandals which GOP primary voters need to know more about:

1. Business Slush Funds: Perry made heavy use of business incentive “slush funds” which used taxpayer dollars to subsidize selected businesses, many of them run by his major campaign contributors. Just two of these funds, the Texas Enterprise Fund and the Texas Emerging Growth fund, spent over $700 million to subsidize businesses to move to Texas or expand operations in Texas, with little evidence that these handouts of taxpayer money produced job or revenue growth anywhere near sufficient to justify the expense. In fact, many of these businesses eventually downsized or relocated long before they had earned the money Perry gave them, or even went bankrupt with $25 million fund dollars like Countrywide Financial.

2. Toll Roads and Land Seizures Perry has never met a toll road project he wasn’t willing to seize huge amounts of private land for and then give the exclusive management contracts to foreign corporations. Perry’s time in office has set records for eminent domain land seizures – over a million acres have been seized. His toll road projects have confiscated family farms and torn communities apart. Toll roads have been used as a massive off-the-books tax program, taking money from Texas drivers and feeding it to foreign financial interests and management groups which lobbied the governor for special deals which produce much higher tolls and higher profits than are typical in other states.

3. Forced Vaccinations: In 2007 Perry issued an executive order which would have forcibly vaccinated every girl in Texas entering the sixth grade with Merck’s Gardasil vaccine for Human Papilloma Virus. This massive violation of the privacy rights of Texas teenagers and their parents would have come at a cost of $360 in taxpayer money per shot. It would have been a huge windfall for Merck, which had paid Perry’s former Chief of Staff $250,000 to lobby the governor and legislature to promote the forced vaccination program.

4. The Job-Killing Franchise Tax: Knowing that it would be impossible to pass an income tax against popular opposition in Texas, Perry promoted the idea of a special business tax called the “Franchise Tax” which taxes businesses at different arbitrary rates set by the government. This tax expands business taxes to types of businesses which are not taxed in most states and in many cases taxes small businesses more than large corporations they compete with. For example it taxes small car repair shops at double the rate it taxes large dealerships for car repairs. It’s a small business and job killer.

5. Scuttled the Anti-TSA Bill When Rep. David Simpson led the Texas legislature towards passage of an enormously popular bill (HB1938) to hold the TSA accountable for intrusive searches of airline passengers, Perry played a key role in making sure that the bill was not passed. When the TSA and the Justice Department began pressuring him, although Perry had promised to submit the bill to the special legislative session, he delayed submitting the bill until it was so late in the session that it was virtually impossible to hold the constitutionally mandated votes necessary for passage. That way he could score points with the public for submitting the popular bill while at the same time making sure that it wouldn’t pass. It’s a classic example of Perry’s insincere pandering. source

More @ http://www.rlc.org/2011/08/12/texas-rlc-sends-out-warning-on-rick-perry/

Club for Growth Praises Congressman Ron Paul

July 21st, 2011

The Club for Growth has issued an updated White Paper on Congressman Ron Paul that notes
–Ron Paul’s record on taxes is excellent, epitomized by his rallying cry for phasing out the IRS. A strong believer in the economic benefits of tax cuts, he declared in a 2006 article, “I reject the notion that tax cuts harm the economy. The economy suffers when government takes money from your paycheck that you otherwise spend, save, or invest. Taxes never create prosperity.”

–”Rep. Paul’s strong belief in limited government translated into an impressive list of votes against increased federal spending:

Voted against the Medicare Prescription Drug Act
Voted for a substitute amendment to balance the budget by 2002 by cutting non-defense discretionary spending and applying the savings to increased tax cuts
Voted for an amendment to prohibit the use of appropriated funds for the development of national reading and math tests
Voted nine out of nine times against raising his own pay
Voted against increased funding for the Legal Services Corporation
Voted for the fiscally conservative Republican Study Committee budget multiple times
Was 1 of 41 congressmen to vote against No Child Left Behind
Voted to cut mohair, sugar, and Viagra subsidies
Voted against the subsidy-laden 2002 Farm Bill
Voted against the 1998 and 2005 Highway bill, only 1 of 9 to vote against the pork-filled 2005 bill
Voted against the Stimulus, TARP, auto bailout, and Cash for Clunkers

–”Rep. Paul’s limited-government philosophy found a particularly useful victim in the country’s entitlement programs. Long in favor of reducing individual dependence on government, Rep. Paul was a vociferous opponent of Medicare Part D, calling it “firmly in keeping with the failed New Deal and Great Society programs of the utopian left.” Some of his most pro-growth votes include:

Voted to lift the limitations and caps on medical savings accounts
Voted to allow individuals to deduct the cost of medical savings accounts from their taxable income
Voted against the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill
Voted to allow small businesses to band together to buy health insurance for their employees
Voted against SCHIP
Voted against ObamaCare

–”Ron Paul has a stellar record of protecting political free speech. He has consistently voted against pernicious bills seeking to gag political speech in the public sphere. Some examples:

Voted against the anti-speech 527 Reform Bill
Voted against various forms of McCain-Feingold
Voted against the DISCLOSE Act, which would reassert McCain-Feingold ideas that were declared unconstitutional.
Voted against the Fairness Doctrine, which would allow government to control the balance of messaging on the airwaves.
There is no question about Rep. Paul’s steadfast respect for the First Amendment.

The full report, including sometimes reasonable criticisms of Congressman Paul can be found @ http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=921